We’ve Moved!

Welcome to the Court blog's new home on WordPress. We've taken on a new look, which we hope you find aesthetically preferable to our old digs on Blogger. Our blog is new and improved. More importantly, we've added new features: If you'd like to receive emails whenever we post new information, you may sign up to follow … Continue reading We’ve Moved!

Appeals Board Issues Opinion Disfavoring Bifurcation

The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board sent a rather forceful message regarding the bifurcation of compensation hearings yesterday in Cotton v. HUMACare, Inc., et al. In a word, don’t. The case involved Karen Cotton’s entitlement to survivor benefits after her husband fell to his death from atop a cell tower on the job for Central … Continue reading Appeals Board Issues Opinion Disfavoring Bifurcation

Appeals Board Affirms in Lightfoot

The Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the order of the Hon. Audrey Headrick, Chattanooga, on Monday in Lightfoot v. Xerox Business Services. In a 2-1 opinion, Presiding Judge Marshall Davidson found Judge Headrick did not abuse her discretion in dismissing the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute. The case sat on Judge Headrick's docket … Continue reading Appeals Board Affirms in Lightfoot

Oral Arguments Redux

 The Bureau's Communications Coordinator, Anna K. Houser, captured a few of photographic highlights from last week's oral arguments at Belmont University College of Law in Nashville. Excellent work, Ms. Houser. Judge Timothy Conner of the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board asks a question, while Judges Marshall Davidson (presiding) and David Hensley listened intently to the … Continue reading Oral Arguments Redux

Appeals Board Conducts its First Oral Arguments

By Jane Salem, Staff Attorney, Court of Workers' Compensation Claims The Tennessee Workers Compensation Appeals Board must decide whether to breathe new life into two cases dismissed with prejudice. The Board held its first set of oral arguments on Aug. 31 at Belmont University College of Law in Nashville, before a courtroom packed with lawyers, Bureau … Continue reading Appeals Board Conducts its First Oral Arguments

What’s New with the Practices and Procedures?

When the Court updated its Practices and Procedures in July 2016, you may have found yourself asking “what’s new?” or “what’s different?” Some changes were minimal and likely went unnoticed by most. For example, the phrase “pro se” was changed to “self-represented” for consistency. However, there were a few substantive changes as well. Below are the changes for which you … Continue reading What’s New with the Practices and Procedures?

More Guidance from the Appeals Board

Our Appeals Board continues to build a battery of caselaw interpreting the Reform Act. In Sirkin v. Trans Carriers, Inc., et al.,  the Board pointed out that compensability and causation are not interchangeable concepts. Payne v. D and D Electric, et al. examined summary judgment in the workers' compensation context. The Board discussed bifurcation of compensability … Continue reading More Guidance from the Appeals Board

In Re: Snakes

By Judge Brian Addingtion, KingsportSnakes. You either love them or hate them. I love them. The snake in this photo was innocently warming himself inside my outbuilding this spring. He was two feet long. I have removed a snake from the same location every spring for the last seven years. The one this spring was the smallest so far. My wife is … Continue reading In Re: Snakes