By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Trial judges in the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims don't have jurisdiction to decide insurance coverage disputes when a carrier alleges untimely payment of premiums. The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board reached that conclusion last week in Martinez v. ACG Roofing, Inc. But the Board’s opinion also gave a … Continue reading Workers’ compensation judges can’t decide coverage disputes
Tag: case law
The Workers’ Comp Hillbillies
By Judge Brian Addington, Gray While an undergrad at Pikeville College (now University of Pikeville), I was exposed to a popular cultural gathering called “Hillbilly Days.” Occurring in the home county to the McCoys of the Hatfield-McCoy feud, let me just say . . . they know how to party. There’s a parade, food, singing, … Continue reading The Workers’ Comp Hillbillies
Taking Judicial Notice
By Judge Audrey Headrick, Chattanooga “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” --John Adams Have you ever asked anyone how they knew a particular fact, and they responded, “Oh, come on. Everybody knows that.” Well, … Continue reading Taking Judicial Notice
Board Offers Framework for Notice Cases
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Earlier this week, the Appeals Board issued an important opinion explaining how parties, practitioners and judges should approach the notice defense in the future. It is essential reading. The 18-page opinion, Ernstes v. Printpack, also traced the history of the notice requirement in the workers’ compensation law, as well … Continue reading Board Offers Framework for Notice Cases
The Law of the Subsequent Injury Fund
By Judge Allen Phillips, Jackson "If an employee has previously sustained a permanent disability . . . he shall be entitled to compensation from his employer or the employer's insurance carrier only for the disability that would have resulted from the latter injury . . . provided, however, that in addition to such compensation for … Continue reading The Law of the Subsequent Injury Fund
Direct and Natural Consequences Rule Remains Intact
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Last week, the Appeals Board issued its second opinion in two years in which it upheld the direct and natural consequences rule in workers’ compensation cases. Presiding Judge Timothy Conner wrote a concurring opinion, however, remarking that guidance from the Tennessee high court would be useful. Facts Natacha Hudgins … Continue reading Direct and Natural Consequences Rule Remains Intact
Appeals Board, 2022: Part Two
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Welcome back to our final installment in the three-part series on last year’s workers’ compensation appellate opinions. Notice I noticed this was an issue in a handful of opinions (See what I did there? I know; my comic genius is being wasted as a staff attorney. But it's hard … Continue reading Appeals Board, 2022: Part Two
Appeals Board Opinions, 2022: Part One
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board had another busy year in 2022. This article will recap cases (which you really need to read!) on all things medical: causation, reasonably necessary treatment, noncompliance, etc. We’ll also look at a couple cases about other categories of benefits. Medical causation As practitioners … Continue reading Appeals Board Opinions, 2022: Part One
Looking Back at 2022: Supreme Court Panel Opinions
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Happy New Year! Every January, we post a series of articles summarizing the appellate opinions from the previous year. This year is no exception. Here’s the roadmap for this article. We’ll start with a few words about the year generally, followed by the “rule” for these articles. Then we’ll … Continue reading Looking Back at 2022: Supreme Court Panel Opinions
Presumptions in Tennessee Workers’ Compensation
By Judge Brian Addington, Gray History buffs like me will remember the words of H.M. Stanley: “Dr. Livingstone, I presume.” And, anyone who watches movies or television can likely complete this sentence: A criminal defendant is “presumed ______ until _______.” Or if someone disappears, how many years until they’re presumed dead? We have many presumptions … Continue reading Presumptions in Tennessee Workers’ Compensation
C-32s: Law, Cases and Practice Pointers
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville What if there were an easy way to get a physician’s opinion into evidence? Great news! For 35 years now, we’ve had that shortcut: section 50-6-235 and its rule counterpart, 0800-02-01-.09. The statute and rule state that a party may file the form instead of a physician’s deposition. Form … Continue reading C-32s: Law, Cases and Practice Pointers
Board Affirms Open Medicals Ruling
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Last week, the Appeals Board released an opinion affirming a trial court’s decision to order an employer to authorize a visit to the designated doctor under an open medical benefits provision of a compensation order. The self-represented employee prevailed—but the opinion offers valuable guidance for what an employer can … Continue reading Board Affirms Open Medicals Ruling
Appeals Board Stresses Panel Requirement
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Employers/carriers: as a general rule, when an employee reports a work injury, you must offer a panel of three physicians within three business days. This requirement isn’t new; yet it still isn’t followed universally. An Appeals Board opinion released last week shows that when a panel isn’t given, the … Continue reading Appeals Board Stresses Panel Requirement
Board Determines the Court’s Discretion with Requests for Admissions
By Janaye Godfrey, Court Intern, Nashville Belmont University College of Law ‘24 The Appeals Board released an opinion last week determining the scope of a trial court’s discretion when applying Rule 36 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs requests for admissions. In Holt v. Quality Floor Coverings, LLC, the employee alleged an … Continue reading Board Determines the Court’s Discretion with Requests for Admissions
Board Considers Noncompliance, Letters to Experts
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville The Appeals Board released an opinion yesterday, reiterating the fairly well-settled parameters of medical noncompliance in the Workers’ Compensation Law. The decision also held that trial judges have an obligation to scrutinize letters seeking expert opinions for their accuracy regarding the facts and law. In Marie Bailey v. Amazon, … Continue reading Board Considers Noncompliance, Letters to Experts
Appeals Board Clarifies Notice and Prejudice
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville An Appeals Board opinion released on Monday offers guidance on notice and in particular what constitutes prejudice to an employer, among other notable rulings. In Hannah v. Senior Citizens Home Assistance Services, Inc., Donna Hannah, a home healthcare provider, alleged she injured her neck when moving a client. At … Continue reading Appeals Board Clarifies Notice and Prejudice
Board Reverses in Love versus Love Management
By Sarah Byrne, staff attorney, Nashville Recently, the Appeals Board issued its opinion in Love v. Love Management, Inc., reversing the trial court for applying incorrect legal standards when it denied the insurer a continuance and granted partial summary judgment to Mrs. Love. Because it bears repeating, Presiding Judge Timothy Conner wrote a concurring opinion … Continue reading Board Reverses in Love versus Love Management
Direct and Natural Consequences Rule Remains Intact
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board ruled earlier this week that the Reform Act of 2013 didn’t affect the longstanding “direct and natural consequences rule” for causation. The Board additionally held that the trial court correctly admitted a vocational expert’s testimony into evidence, despite the fact that he destroyed … Continue reading Direct and Natural Consequences Rule Remains Intact
Year in Review: Appeals Board, part 2
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Welcome back to the last of a three-part series on 2021’s appellate decisions. As the title implies, this article covers the remainder of the Board opinions from last year on many different issues. You are reading the cases in their entirety, right? Thanks. Summary judgment This is a fine … Continue reading Year in Review: Appeals Board, part 2
Year in Review: Appeals Board, part one
By Jane Salem, staff attorney, Nashville Welcome back to a review of 2021’s appellate opinions. In this article, we’ll recap the Appeals Board opinions involving course and scope, medical causation and reasonable necessity, including utilization review, and an opinion about the Medical Impairment Rating Registry. But first… please read the opinions! Because I’ll mention just … Continue reading Year in Review: Appeals Board, part one
From the Bench 